Comparative Analysis of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Pharmacological Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Latin America.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is one of the leading causes of death and disability in the world. The majority of diabetes deaths (> 80%) occur in low- and middle-income countries, which are predominant in Latin America. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to compare the clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the pharmacological management of T2DM in Latin America (LA) with international reference guidelines. RECENT FINDINGS: Several LA countries have recently developed CPGs. However, the quality of these guidelines is unknown according to the AGREE II tool and taking as reference three CPGs of international impact: American Diabetes Association (ADA), European Diabetes Association (EASD), and Latin American Diabetes Association (ALAD). Ten CPGs were selected for analysis. The ADA scored > 80% on the AGREE II domains and was selected as the main comparator. Eighty percent of LA CPGs were developed before 2018. Only one was not recommended (all domains < 60%). The CPGs in LA have good quality but are outdated. They have significant gaps compared to the reference. There is a need for improvement, as proposing updates every three years to maintain the best available clinical evidence in all guidelines.

Guía colombiana de práctica clínica para el tratamiento de la diabetes mellitus tipo 2: falla al tratamiento inicial / Colombian Clinical Practice Guideline for Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: First Line Treatment Failure

Introducción: Existen diferentes opciones de manejo para pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (DMT2) que ya iniciaron tratamiento farmacológico con metformina y no han alcanzado metas de control glucémico. Resulta prioritario definir pautas para escoger la mejor opción en estos pacientes, así como en aquellos que no han tenido un control óptimo con la combinación de dos medicamentos. Objetivo: Definir cuál es antidiabético de elección, entre sulfonilureas, tiazolidinedionas, inhibidores de DPP-4, agonista del receptor de GLP-1 o insulina basal, como segunda y tercera líneas de manejo en pacientes con DMT2. Métodos: Se elaboró la guía de práctica clínica, siguiendo los lineamientos de la guía metodológica del Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social colombiano. Se revisó la evidencia disponible de forma sistemática y se formularon las recomendaciones utilizando la metodología GRADE. Conclusiones: En pacientes con DMT2 y falla terapéutica al manejo con metformina como monoterapia (HbA1C > 7 %) se recomienda como primera opción adicionar un inhibidor DPP-4, como segunda opción adicionar inhibidor SGLT2 o sulfonilureas con bajo riesgo de hipoglucemia y como tercera opción agregar insulina basal a los pacientes que con la combinación de dos fármacos fallen en alcanzar su meta de HbA1C. Si la falla terapéutica se asocia con un IMC persistentemente ≥ 30, se sugiere la adición de un agonista de GLP-1 por el potencial beneficio sobre la reducción de peso.

Introduction: There are different options to treat type 2 diabetes (DMT2) patients who began treatment with metformin and have not reached therapeutic golds. It is imperative to define rules to choose the best option, in these patients, as in those who have not achieved an optimal control under combined therapy. Aim: To define the best option between sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, DPP4 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonist or basal insulin, as second or third line treatment, in patients with DMT2 who have not reached therapeutic golds with metformin or combined therapy. Methods: A clinical practice guide has been developed following the broad outline of the methodological guide from the Colombian Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, with the aim of systematically gathering scientific evidence and formulating recommendations using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology. Conclusions: In patients with DMT2 who did not reach their therapeutic goal with metformin as a monotherapy (Hb1Ac <7%), addition of a second oral antidiabetic medication is recommended. it is recommended as a first step to add a DPP-4 inhibitor. It is suggested to add a SGLT2 inhibitor or a sulfonylurea having low risk of hypoglycemia as acceptable options. It is suggested to add basal insulin as a third antidiabetic medication if the combination of two pharmacological treatments does not enable the patient to reach and maintain the HbA1c goal. It is suggested to add a GLP-1 agonist if therapeutic failure appears in patients who remain obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m²), considering its potential to reduce weight.